New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 620856 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: Assigned
Owner:
rohi...@chromium.org
Cc:
ihf@chromium.org
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Chrome
Pri: 3
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Some DUTs have both 'cts_abi_x86' and 'cts_abi_arm'

Reported by jrbarnette@chromium.org, Jun 16 2016 
$ atest host list -b cts_abi_x86,cts_abi_arm | wc -l
1739

Also, really, those label names don't really follow
convention.  It would be better to name them 'cts_abi:x86'
and 'cts_abi:arm' instead.

I'm calling this P3, because _I_ don't care.  :-)

You may want to bump the priority.

Comment 1 by rohi...@chromium.org, Jun 16 2016 

x86 devices have been labeled as cts_abi_arm as we need to run arm and x86 CTS tests on x86 devices.

Sure, I will fix the convention part after I am done with other important tasks :-)

Comment 2 by jrbarnette@chromium.org, Jun 16 2016 

> x86 devices have been labeled as cts_abi_arm as we need
> to run arm and x86 CTS tests on x86 devices.

That's rather confusing.  Perhaps 'cts_abi_arm' should be
renamed 'cts_abi_common'?

Comment 3 by rohi...@chromium.org, Jun 16 2016

Cc: ihf@chromium.org

Comment 4 by rohi...@chromium.org, Jun 16 2016 

I think we were trying to keep labeling very simple and readable. Ilja might have  other points from developer perspective.

Comment 5 by ihf@chromium.org, Jun 16 2016 

It is true that Intel machines support both arm and x86 ABI. That part is not a bug.

Comment 6 by ihf@chromium.org, Jun 16 2016 

We can change the naming to follow convention, otherwise this is a WontFix.

Comment 7 by zalcorn@chromium.org, Feb 16 2018

Components: Infra>Labs
►

Sign in to add a comment