Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
6.1% regression in page_cycler.basic_oopif at 398633:398659 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 24 2016
Sent off another bisect.
,
Jun 25 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@398632 45172.0 80.9096 12 good chromium@398659 45280.9 171.917 12 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 619020 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.basic_oopif Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_renderer/vm_private_dirty_final_renderer Relative Change: 0.18% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/238 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9008941718232388704 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5900713704554496 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jun 27 2016
Closing. Can't bisect and the level is way lower than it was shortly before the regression. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pmeenan@chromium.org
, Jun 10 2016