Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.1%-4.6% regression in page_cycler.intl_ko_th_vi at 398623:398762 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 10 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@398676 43771.1 22423.6 9 good chromium@398682 36008.1 9648.48 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 619019 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.intl_hi_ru Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_renderer/vm_private_dirty_final_renderer Relative Change: 29.63% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3008 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9010235481992063280 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5814258147786752 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jun 10 2016
Re-kicked a more focused bisect
,
Jun 11 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : cc: Separate raster and decode prepaint regions. Author : vmpstr Commit description: This patch separates raster and decode distances to be independent of each other. Specifically, any tile in prepaint that is further than 1000 screen space pixels from the viewport will not be rasterized. Instead, we will pull out the images on those tiles and predecode those instead. R=enne, ericrk CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2007163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#398677} Commit : 70a29c1298e666c465a8e75530575eda1aeaa37c Date : Wed Jun 08 21:21:04 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@398663 120545 782.743 5 good chromium@398672 120004 452.666 5 good chromium@398675 120707 488.141 5 good chromium@398676 120378 797.905 5 good chromium@398677 131866 1377.53 5 bad <-- chromium@398681 131304 357.708 5 bad chromium@398699 131147 295.522 5 bad chromium@398735 131597 504.641 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 619019 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.typical_25 Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_renderer/http___premierleague.com Relative Change: 9.17% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1823 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9010213559558205872 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5909736210300928 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pmeenan@chromium.org
, Jun 10 2016