Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.3% regression in speedometer at 399110:399128 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 10 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@399109 24420.5 1578.77 18 good chromium@399128 24019.0 1656.47 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 619011 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests speedometer Test Metric: Total/Total Relative Change: 5.47% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1822 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9010235649972675264 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5344562134908928 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jun 10 2016
Closing. This one wasn't a real regression and is the second alert on the graph (the real regression was the first one). |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pmeenan@chromium.org
, Jun 10 2016