Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.6%-5.2% regression in speedometer at 397402:397441 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@397413 290.678 5.04678 18 good chromium@397441 291.708 6.15357 18 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64intel_perf_bisect Bug ID: 618223 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests speedometer Test Metric: BackboneJS-TodoMVC/BackboneJS-TodoMVC Relative Change: 1.24% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64intel_perf_bisect/builds/939 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9010436002697116672 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6391162718388224 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jun 8 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hablich@chromium.org
, Jun 8 2016