Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Possible ordering issue generating kasko_features.h |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionhttps://build.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/Win/builds/44040/steps/compile/logs/stdio [5167/33845] CXX obj\chrome\installer\setup\setup_lib.installer_crash_reporting.obj FAILED: obj/chrome/installer/setup/setup_lib.installer_crash_reporting.obj ninja -t msvc -e environment.x86 -- C:\b\build\slave\cache\cipd\goma/gomacc "C:\b\depot_tools\win_toolchain\vs_files\95ddda401ec5678f15eeed01d2bee08fcbc5ee97\VC\bin\amd64_x86\cl.exe" /nologo /showIncludes /FC @obj\chrome\installer\setup\setup_lib.installer_crash_reporting.obj.rsp /c ..\..\chrome\installer\setup\installer_crash_reporting.cc /Foobj\chrome\installer\setup\setup_lib.installer_crash_reporting.obj /Fdobj\chrome\setup_lib.cc.pdb c:\b\build\slave\win\build\src\components\crash\content\app\crashpad.h(15): fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'third_party/kasko/kasko_features.h': No such file or directory AFAICT, neither crashpad.h nor third_party/kasko has changed in months. I suspect https://codereview.chromium.org/2038473002/ , but I'm not entirely sure I have time to debug things this evening.
,
Jun 5 2016
It feels like a problem where incremental builds worked because the header file was in place, but something initiated a clobber build and the file wasn't in place BUT, chrome-cron later forced a build with a VERSION change, and it was clean. So I'm going to open things. Maybe this is a red herring? Maybe build systems are subtle and quick to anger?
,
Jun 6 2016
What I tried to say in my previous comment is that incremental builds will most likely succeed even if there are missing dependencies but they may cause random failures after a clobber build. So, we should track those missing dependencies and fix them. The CL by blundell@ did fix one such missing dependency, but it is probably only one in many.
,
Jun 6 2016
This issue is crbug.com/611319 . That CL was an attempt to fix the flaky dependency problem, but it looks like it didn't get the job done. The CL is not the *cause* of the flaky dependency problem, though.
,
Jun 6 2016
Looks like builds have been clean since I re-opened, so I guess flaky sounds right. Apologies for not searching for a bug. It honestly didn't even occur to me :-). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sdefresne@chromium.org
, Jun 5 2016