Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
141.4% regression in v8.infinite_scroll at 396151:396191 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 1 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@396150 15.2016 4.44973 15 good chromium@396191 13.5868 4.01093 10 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 616518 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll Test Metric: Animation-v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/discourse Relative Change: 12.85% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6557 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9011037652789144704 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5839386860584960 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jun 2 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@395881 14.686 1.62003 13 good chromium@395965 11.046 6.96216 12 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 616518 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll Test Metric: Animation-v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/discourse Relative Change: 4.06% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6560 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9011022646069672176 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5771587043721216 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jun 2 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@395820 12.3608 5.75997 15 good chromium@395881 13.5691 4.74604 11 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 616518 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll Test Metric: Animation-v8-gc-incremental-finalize_max/discourse Relative Change: 8.78% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6561 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9011022636988899792 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5909471331614720 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jun 2 2016
@ulan : Assigning to you since you are the owner of this test and the bisect bot isn't coming back with a clear regression. Is this something we need to worry about or can we close this as WontFix?
,
Jul 7 2016
Moving this nonessential bug to the next milestone. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Jul 15 2016
Recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by briander...@chromium.org
, Jun 1 2016