New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 614128 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 577962
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2016
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: All
Pri: 3
Type: Feature

Blocking:
issue 510287



Sign in to add a comment

bluetooth: Should we introduce an ID type?

Project Member Reported by ortuno@chromium.org, May 23 2016

Issue description

We exchange many Id strings between the browser process and the renderer process e.g. device id, service id, characteristic id, etc.

Introducing a new BluetoothId type would allow us to validate these strings when receiving them in the browser process.

Using a BluetoothId for service id, characteristic id, etc. in device/bluetooth might not be the right thing to do since the id format varies per platform but it would add another layer of security for the generated device ids in content/browser/bluetooth.
 

Comment 1 by ortuno@chromium.org, May 23 2016

Mergedinto: 577962
Status: Duplicate (was: Available)
Ah seems there is an issue for it already. Deduping.

Sign in to add a comment