Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
83.6% regression in thread_times.simple_mobile_sites at 395226:395254 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 23 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@395225 0.114455 0.0148905 5 good chromium@395254 0.168725 0.0495659 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 613891 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.simple_mobile_sites Test Metric: thread_other_cpu_time_per_frame/thread_other_cpu_time_per_frame Relative Change: 46.59% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1323 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9011902118891235600 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5778398090100736 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jun 10 2016
Recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by kouhei@chromium.org
, May 23 2016