New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 613534 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: May 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

15.8% regression in oortonline at 394810:394851

Project Member Reported by hpayer@chromium.org, May 20 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hpayer@chromium.org, May 20 2016

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=613534

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgjPWooAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11

Comment 2 by hpayer@chromium.org, May 20 2016

Cc: mlippautz@chromium.org u...@chromium.org jochen@chromium.org
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 20 2016

Cc: erikc...@chromium.org
Owner: erikc...@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author erikchen@chromium.org ===

Hi erikchen@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly
causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether
your CL be related.


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : Disable WebGL Image Chromium.
Author  : erikchen
Commit description:
  
There are two bugs. Once those bugs are fixed, I will reenable the feature.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=581777#c37

BUG= 581777 

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1970013002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#394817}
Commit  : 3917dfa56470738f8b20e209cdcc80fc0e1d1985
Date    : Thu May 19 18:20:07 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@394800  5396.0  27.0185  5  good
chromium@394809  5414.0  33.6155  5  good
chromium@394814  5426.0  35.7771  5  good
chromium@394816  5390.0  26.4575  5  good
chromium@394817  4568.0  14.8324  5  bad    <--
chromium@394818  4554.0  8.94427  5  bad
chromium@394835  4546.0  5.47723  5  bad
chromium@394870  4554.0  15.1658  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 613534

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests oortonline
Test Metric: Total/http___oortonline.gl__run
Relative Change: 15.60%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_11_perf_bisect/builds/643
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9012143788567714400


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5228407730733056

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 20 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : Disable WebGL Image Chromium.
Author  : erikchen
Commit description:
  
There are two bugs. Once those bugs are fixed, I will reenable the feature.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=581777#c37

BUG= 581777 

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1970013002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#394817}
Commit  : 3917dfa56470738f8b20e209cdcc80fc0e1d1985
Date    : Thu May 19 18:20:07 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@394809  5392.0  10.9545  5  good
chromium@394815  5410.0  30.8221  5  good
chromium@394816  5394.0  21.9089  5  good
chromium@394817  4590.0  24.4949  5  bad    <--
chromium@394818  4588.0  10.9545  5  bad
chromium@394820  4596.0  11.4018  5  bad
chromium@394830  4608.0  19.2354  5  bad
chromium@394851  4588.0  16.4317  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 613534

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests oortonline
Test Metric: Total/http___oortonline.gl__run
Relative Change: 14.91%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_11_perf_bisect/builds/642
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9012143815550992224


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5814101951905792

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Cc: kbr@chromium.org
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Nice to get more confirmation that CA compositor is a performance win.

Will re-enable in the future.

Sign in to add a comment