New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 612269 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
OOO until 2019-01-24
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Windows
Pri: 2
Type: Bug

Blocked on:
issue 596622



Sign in to add a comment

Flaky failure of WebglConformance.conformance_canvas_drawingbuffer_hd_dpi_test on Windows

Project Member Reported by kbr@chromium.org, May 16 2016

Issue description

Showing up on the commit queue at a rate of about once a day, or less frequently. Some recent failures:

https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_ng/builds/221998
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_ng/builds/220385
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_ng/builds/219008

Failure mode:

[ RUN      ] WebglConformance.conformance_canvas_drawingbuffer_hd_dpi_test
(INFO) 2016-05-15 16:59:33,430 cache_temperature.EnsurePageCacheTemperature:29  PageCacheTemperature: any
[1380:2492:0515/165933:INFO:CONSOLE(11)] "at (60, 124) expected: 0,255,0,255 was 0,0,0,255", source:  (11)
[1380:2492:0515/165933:INFO:CONSOLE(11)] "FAIL at (60, 124) expected: 0,255,0,255 was 0,0,0,255", source:  (11)
[1380:2492:0515/165933:INFO:CONSOLE(11)] "at (508, 252) expected: 0,255,0,255 was 0,0,0,0", source:  (11)
[1380:2492:0515/165933:INFO:CONSOLE(11)] "FAIL at (508, 252) expected: 0,255,0,255 was 0,0,0,0", source:  (11)
[1380:2492:0515/165934:INFO:CONSOLE(11)] "at (252, 508) expected: 0,255,0,255 was 0,0,0,0", source:  (11)
[1380:2492:0515/165934:INFO:CONSOLE(11)] "FAIL at (252, 508) expected: 0,255,0,255 was 0,0,0,0", source:  (11)
FLAKY TEST FAILURE, retrying: WebglConformance.conformance_canvas_drawingbuffer_hd_dpi_test
FLAKY TEST FAILURE, retrying: WebglConformance.conformance_canvas_drawingbuffer_hd_dpi_test
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\users\chrome~1\appdata\local\temp\rundyiu7p\third_party\catapult\telemetry\telemetry\internal\story_runner.py", line 84, in _RunStoryAndProcessErrorIfNeeded
    state.RunStory(results)
  File "c:\users\chrome~1\appdata\local\temp\rundyiu7p\content\test\gpu\gpu_tests\gpu_test_base.py", line 122, in RunStory
    RunStoryWithRetries(DesktopGpuSharedPageState, self, results)
  File "c:\users\chrome~1\appdata\local\temp\rundyiu7p\content\test\gpu\gpu_tests\gpu_test_base.py", line 95, in RunStoryWithRetries
    super(cls, shared_page_state).RunStory(results)
  File "c:\users\chrome~1\appdata\local\temp\rundyiu7p\third_party\catapult\telemetry\telemetry\page\shared_page_state.py", line 332, in RunStory
    self._current_page, self._current_tab, results)
  File "c:\users\chrome~1\appdata\local\temp\rundyiu7p\content\test\gpu\gpu_tests\webgl_conformance.py", line 87, in ValidateAndMeasurePage
    raise page_test.Failure(_WebGLTestMessages(tab))
Failure: at (252, 508) expected: 0,255,0,255 was 0,0,0,0
FAIL at (252, 508) expected: 0,255,0,255 was 0,0,0,0


[  FAILED  ] WebglConformance.conformance_canvas_drawingbuffer_hd_dpi_test (792 ms)

It's distressing that the flaky retry mechanism isn't addressing this issue.

 

Comment 1 by kbr@chromium.org, May 16 2016

Summary: Flaky failure of WebglConformance.conformance_canvas_drawingbuffer_hd_dpi_test on Windows (was: Flaky failure of WebglConformance.conformance_canvas_drawingbuffer_hd_dpi_test)
Also: happening only on Windows, and apparently only on the AMD GPU trybots.

Comment 2 by kbr@chromium.org, May 16 2016

Labels: -Pri-1 Pri-2
Seen on multiple machines:

https://chromium-swarm.appspot.com/user/task/2ecfabc91eca6c10 was build109-m4: https://chromium-swarm.appspot.com/restricted/bot/build109-m4

https://chromium-swarm.appspot.com/user/task/2ebc03c85fe19710 was build69-m4: https://chromium-swarm.appspot.com/restricted/bot/build69-m4

Both of these bots have since run many webgl_conformance_tests steps cleanly. Not sure what may be going on here. Had been hoping it would be a consistent problem on just a couple of these bots.

May have to skip this test on Windows AMD due to flakiness, which would be unfortunate.

Comment 3 by kbr@chromium.org, Dec 19 2016

Blocking: -596622

Comment 4 by kbr@chromium.org, Dec 19 2016

Blockedon: 596622

Sign in to add a comment