New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 611779 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Fixed
Owner:
Last visit 27 days ago
Closed: Aug 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

2.3%-5.2% regression in page_cycler.intl_ar_fa_he at 392948:393200

Project Member Reported by pras...@chromium.org, May 13 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 13 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@393160  34074.4  121.52   12  good
chromium@393167  34050.3  229.713  12  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 611779

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.morejs
Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser
Relative Change: 0.08%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1793
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9012759903036132224


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5846907532869632

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 3 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jun 1 2016

Labels: -M-52 M-53 MovedFrom-52
Moving this nonessential bug to the next milestone.

For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@393160  41624.3  620.096  12  good
chromium@393200  41612.6  164.993  8   bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 611779

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.intl_ar_fa_he
Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser
Relative Change: 0.40%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1856
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9008138246098092912


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5258472111734784

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 10 2016

Labels: -M-53 MovedFrom-53
This issue has been moved once and is lower than Pri-1. Removing the milestone.

For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@393160  41839.7  860.123  12  good
chromium@393200  42063.2  836.551  12  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 611779

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.intl_ar_fa_he
Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser
Relative Change: 1.06%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1960
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005460500343766176


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5817607505051648

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Cc: sullivan@chromium.org
Status: Fixed (was: Assigned)
This has long since recovered.

Sign in to add a comment