New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 611375 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner:
█ rob.b...@samsung.com
Email to this user bounced
Closed: May 2016
Cc:
timloh@chromium.org
nyerramilli@chromium.org
█ ashej...@chromium.org
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux , Windows , Mac
Pri: 1
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

Regression:'search' and 'close' icon is not seen properly in "Weather" extension

Reported by adha...@etouch.net, May 12 2016 
Chrome Version:51.0.2704.47 (Official Build)23ee1b3315bb84717e9a03a7f4a6dcc066823ee0-refs/branch-heads/2704@{#513} 32/64-bit.
OS: Windows(7,8,10), Mac(10.10.5, 10.11.4), Linux(Ubuntu 14.04 LTS)

TEST URL:https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/weather-extension/beapnbfmjmjhhfpaoajfhjbbfnnlfpnc/related?hl=en

What steps will reproduce the problem?
(1)Launch chrome and navigate to the above URL.
(2)Click on "Add to chrome" to apply extension and click on the extension icon near bookmark bar.
(3)observe the 'search' and 'close' icon.

Actual:'search' and 'close' icon is not seen properly.

Expected:'search' and 'close' icon should be seen properly.

This is a Regression issue broken in M-44,below is the Narrow bisect info:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/04d92963d0b324aff0ef9d1db09d3de3890b9cd2..c12a26cb991c224ac29568e3ac0055d247a2cdc5?pretty=fuller&n=100

Suspecting:r194903?

Good build:44.0.2391.0
Bad build:44.0.2393.0

Kindly help to re-assign if your change is not the cause for this issue.
Actual_Expected extension.png
13.2 KB View Download

Comment 1 by rob.b...@samsung.com, May 12 2016

Cc: timloh@chromium.org
It does seem to be r194903. However this was an intentional spec fix. Easiest is if the extension authors simply remove !important from here /1.1.4_0/skin/base.css:

@font-face{font-family:'Glyphicons Halflings Chrome';src:url(../fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff) format('woff'))!important}

I assume Google has some way of contacting them. CCing Timothy too, we could allow !important like before, but this is really not allowed by the spec, and FF does not allow it either (not sure how this extension behaves with FF, my FF nightly does not allow installing it for some reason).

Comment 2 by timloh@chromium.org, May 13 2016

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Going by all the one-star reviews on the extension, I'm just going to close this as WontFix. I think it's outside of our scope to help fix extensions which people call "completely broken".
►

Sign in to add a comment