Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
smoothness.polymer failure on Android S5/N9 at 391688 : 391772 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionRevision range first seen: 391688 : 391772 Link to failing step log: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.perf/builders/Android%20Nexus9%20Perf%20%283%29/builds/1433/steps/smoothness.polymer/logs/stdio If the test is disabled, please downgrade to Pri-2. https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.perf/builders/Android%20Nexus9%20Perf%20%283%29/builds/1433 https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.perf/builders/Android%20Galaxy%20S5%20Perf%20%283%29/builds/1945
,
May 9 2016
,
May 10 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Exit Code Std Dev N Good? chromium@391688 1 N/A 20 good chromium@391772 1 N/A 20 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 610431 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.polymer Test Metric: PolymerAnimation-avg_surface_fps/PolymerAnimation-avg_surface_fps Relative Change: 0.00% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1786 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013112799776924704 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5341440482213888 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
May 10 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Exit Code Std Dev N Good? chromium@391688 1 N/A 20 good chromium@391772 1 N/A 20 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 610431 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.polymer Test Metric: PolymerAnimation-avg_surface_fps/PolymerAnimation-avg_surface_fps Relative Change: 0.00% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1787 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013112764441761440 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5900971641667584 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
May 11 2016
Last two bisect results indicate that this benchmark failed for both known good and known bad revisions. re-kicked the bisect job by expanding revisoins: https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/659
,
Jun 1 2016
Bot is now green and the benchmark is enabled. The failure is somehow fixed. Closing this bug. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by oysteine@chromium.org
, May 9 2016