Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.5%-3.1% regression in page_cycler.typical_25 at 391997:392002 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 9 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@391996 3899.53 41.4321 9 good chromium@392002 3919.21 44.1503 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 610257 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.typical_25 Test Metric: warm_times/page_load_time Relative Change: 0.11% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2171 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013151061233572752 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5347880517238784 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
May 26 2016
This seems to have recovered on most metrics, closing. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, May 9 2016