Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
16.9% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 392164:392186 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 9 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author rdevlin.cronin@chromium.org === Hi rdevlin.cronin@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : [Extensions] Update more bindings and allow for multiple feature access Author : rdevlin.cronin Commit description: Update more of the native handler bindings and allow for handler functions that are called by multiple features. BUG=591164 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1945433002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#392182} Commit : 908ac08879c13a2c74573e88c0ca9d3f1f69eacd Date : Fri May 06 22:23:16 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@392163 112.682 2.0936 5 good chromium@392175 110.784 1.89104 5 good chromium@392181 110.2 3.20998 5 good chromium@392182 94.677 1.14651 5 bad <-- chromium@392183 93.9145 1.13603 5 bad chromium@392184 92.7059 2.4884 5 bad chromium@392186 94.0961 2.40078 5 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_hdd_perf_bisect Bug ID: 610248 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Test Metric: node-list-access/node-list-access Relative Change: 16.49% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/539 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013151219877567440 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5296656321347584 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
May 9 2016
Certainly possible. I'll revert and see if it goes back to normal.
,
May 9 2016
FYI, reverted in revision c827ac207ee330c2fc1423f6796ee017166a524b.
,
May 12 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, May 9 2016