New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 609783 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 609517
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: May 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

25.1% regression in page_cycler.intl_es_fr_pt-BR at 391654:391688

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, May 6 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=609783

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgtKzypAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
Mergedinto: 609517
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : This change enables GPU Raster on OSX.
Author  : ericrk
Commit description:
  
I've compiled a bit of benchmark data to support turning this on -
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1RPEnillJOaOKW47t9DYuttQkvWDo7ilx9KDB_nJnwpc/edit?usp=sharing
Still filling in more data, but I'm pretty happy with the results so far. In
a number of cases we have a performance win, and in most cases we have a power win.

Checking this in now will give us a long canary period before the next branch
point to catch any issues.

BUG= 542959 
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.mac:mac_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.win:win_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.blink:mac_blink_rel

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1881053003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#391655}
Commit  : 8325892c2efdef8cff86ba16e7569f8b424daeda
Date    : Wed May 04 22:14:40 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@391653  270079  1105.54  5  good
chromium@391654  270238  1749.59  5  good
chromium@391655  344714  528.316  5  bad    <--
chromium@391656  344305  990.141  5  bad
chromium@391658  343413  355.006  5  bad
chromium@391662  344567  749.875  5  bad
chromium@391671  343804  1238.54  5  bad
chromium@391688  344475  1428.63  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 609783

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.intl_es_fr_pt-BR
Test Metric: vm_resident_set_size_final_size_total/vm_resident_set_size_final_size_total
Relative Change: 27.55%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1286
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013418698100704576


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5787232653279232

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : This change enables GPU Raster on OSX.
Author  : ericrk
Commit description:
  
I've compiled a bit of benchmark data to support turning this on -
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1RPEnillJOaOKW47t9DYuttQkvWDo7ilx9KDB_nJnwpc/edit?usp=sharing
Still filling in more data, but I'm pretty happy with the results so far. In
a number of cases we have a performance win, and in most cases we have a power win.

Checking this in now will give us a long canary period before the next branch
point to catch any issues.

BUG= 542959 
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.mac:mac_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.win:win_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.blink:mac_blink_rel

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1881053003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#391655}
Commit  : 8325892c2efdef8cff86ba16e7569f8b424daeda
Date    : Wed May 04 22:14:40 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@391653  270202  1277.82  5  good
chromium@391654  270550  1366.59  5  good
chromium@391655  345964  1002.52  5  bad    <--
chromium@391656  344402  1972.31  5  bad
chromium@391658  344256  1107.8   5  bad
chromium@391662  344811  1124.32  5  bad
chromium@391671  345120  712.447  5  bad
chromium@391688  345028  472.604  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 609783

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.intl_es_fr_pt-BR
Test Metric: vm_resident_set_size_final_size_total/vm_resident_set_size_final_size_total
Relative Change: 27.69%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1285
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013418707376478768


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5795830372499456

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : This change enables GPU Raster on OSX.
Author  : ericrk
Commit description:
  
I've compiled a bit of benchmark data to support turning this on -
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1RPEnillJOaOKW47t9DYuttQkvWDo7ilx9KDB_nJnwpc/edit?usp=sharing
Still filling in more data, but I'm pretty happy with the results so far. In
a number of cases we have a performance win, and in most cases we have a power win.

Checking this in now will give us a long canary period before the next branch
point to catch any issues.

BUG= 542959 
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.mac:mac_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.win:win_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.blink:mac_blink_rel

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1881053003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#391655}
Commit  : 8325892c2efdef8cff86ba16e7569f8b424daeda
Date    : Wed May 04 22:14:40 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@391653  280769  1000.98  5  good
chromium@391654  280894  437.357  5  good
chromium@391655  347249  799.302  5  bad    <--
chromium@391656  346090  1419.75  5  bad
chromium@391658  346697  910.967  5  bad
chromium@391663  345718  953.868  5  bad
chromium@391672  346551  1647.6   5  bad
chromium@391690  345319  659.905  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 609783

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.intl_es_fr_pt-BR
Test Metric: vm_resident_set_size_final_size_total/vm_resident_set_size_final_size_total
Relative Change: 22.99%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2111
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013418630998517840


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5838055538163712

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : This change enables GPU Raster on OSX.
Author  : ericrk
Commit description:
  
I've compiled a bit of benchmark data to support turning this on -
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1RPEnillJOaOKW47t9DYuttQkvWDo7ilx9KDB_nJnwpc/edit?usp=sharing
Still filling in more data, but I'm pretty happy with the results so far. In
a number of cases we have a performance win, and in most cases we have a power win.

Checking this in now will give us a long canary period before the next branch
point to catch any issues.

BUG= 542959 
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.mac:mac_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.win:win_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.blink:mac_blink_rel

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1881053003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#391655}
Commit  : 8325892c2efdef8cff86ba16e7569f8b424daeda
Date    : Wed May 04 22:14:40 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@391653  267096  1752.97  5  good
chromium@391654  268033  1306.37  5  good
chromium@391655  331526  1158.75  5  bad    <--
chromium@391656  331673  381.619  5  bad
chromium@391658  331250  1450.52  5  bad
chromium@391662  330613  1675.93  5  bad
chromium@391671  332247  2344.61  5  bad
chromium@391688  333465  5338.9   5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 609783

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.intl_hi_ru
Test Metric: vm_resident_set_size_final_size_total/vm_resident_set_size_final_size_total
Relative Change: 24.85%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1287
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013418569585292224


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5776979157057536

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment