New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 609517 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 614468
Owner:
Closed: May 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

38.4%-40% regression in page_cycler.intl_ja_zh at 391642:391667

Project Member Reported by mustaq@chromium.org, May 5 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=609517

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg1IPUvQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg1IOeswkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
chromium-rel-mac10
Cc: ericrk@chromium.org
Owner: ericrk@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author ericrk@chromium.org ===

Hi ericrk@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly
causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether
your CL be related.


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : This change enables GPU Raster on OSX.
Author  : ericrk
Commit description:
  
I've compiled a bit of benchmark data to support turning this on -
https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1RPEnillJOaOKW47t9DYuttQkvWDo7ilx9KDB_nJnwpc/edit?usp=sharing
Still filling in more data, but I'm pretty happy with the results so far. In
a number of cases we have a performance win, and in most cases we have a power win.

Checking this in now will give us a long canary period before the next branch
point to catch any issues.

BUG= 542959 
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.mac:mac_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.win:win_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.blink:mac_blink_rel

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1881053003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#391655}
Commit  : 8325892c2efdef8cff86ba16e7569f8b424daeda
Date    : Wed May 04 22:14:40 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@391641  301428  1473.61  5  good
chromium@391651  301830  1877.13  5  good
chromium@391654  302180  2358.31  5  good
chromium@391655  442557  7083.17  5  bad    <--
chromium@391656  435005  6014.38  5  bad
chromium@391661  433227  5994.93  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 609517

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.intl_ja_zh
Test Metric: vm_resident_set_size_final_size_total/vm_resident_set_size_final_size_total
Relative Change: 43.72%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1280
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013486335828208064


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5829316890329088

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Comment 3 by ericrk@chromium.org, May 26 2016

Mergedinto: 614468
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment