New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 608923 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
OOO until 2019-01-24
Closed: Aug 2016
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 1
Type: Bug

Blocked on:
issue 605264
issue 606112
issue 608946
issue 612866
issue 613229
issue 614526
issue 617847
issue 619196

Blocking:
issue 603329



Sign in to add a comment

"context_lost_tests (with patch)" is flaky

Project Member Reported by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, May 3 2016

Issue description

"context_lost_tests (with patch)" is flaky.

This issue was created automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app. Please find the right owner to fix the respective test/step and assign this issue to them. If the step/test is infrastructure-related, please add Infra-Troopers label and change issue status to Untriaged. When done, please remove the issue from Sheriff Bug Queue by removing the Sheriff-Chromium label.

We have detected 3 recent flakes. List of all flakes can be found at https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA.

Flaky tests should be disabled within 30 minutes unless culprit CL is found and reverted. Please see more details here: https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/tree-sheriffs/sheriffing-bug-queues#triaging-auto-filed-flakiness-bugs

This flaky test/step was previously tracked in  issue 605064 .
 
Owner: kbr@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
@kbr: Could you take a look at this?

Comment 2 by kbr@chromium.org, May 3 2016

Blockedon: 608946

Comment 3 by kbr@chromium.org, May 3 2016

Blockedon: 606112

Comment 5 by kbr@chromium.org, May 3 2016

Components: Internals>GPU>Testing
Labels: -Sheriff-Chromium
Project Member

Comment 7 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, May 4 2016

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/11920935044f1f08dbed0dfe24656d7704d74553

commit 11920935044f1f08dbed0dfe24656d7704d74553
Author: Scott Little <sclittle@chromium.org>
Date: Wed May 04 00:16:07 2016

Disable flaky GpuCrash.GPUProcessCrashesExactlyOnce test on mac and linux.

TBR=kbr@chromium.org

BUG= 608923 
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.mac:mac_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.win:win_optional_gpu_tests_rel

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1947673003 .

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#391405}

[modify] https://crrev.com/11920935044f1f08dbed0dfe24656d7704d74553/content/test/gpu/gpu_tests/context_lost_expectations.py

Project Member

Comment 8 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, May 4 2016

Labels: Sheriff-Chromium
Detected 12 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app. Since flakiness is ongoing, the issue was moved back into Sheriff Bug Queue (unless already there).

Comment 9 by kbr@chromium.org, May 5 2016

Another suppression incoming in https://codereview.chromium.org/1947303002/ .

Project Member

Comment 10 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, May 5 2016

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/0795777fbf9349b39b0c66704e5ce7633add15b8

commit 0795777fbf9349b39b0c66704e5ce7633add15b8
Author: kbr <kbr@chromium.org>
Date: Thu May 05 00:24:09 2016

Skip GpuCrash.GPUProcessCrashesExactlyOnce on all platforms.

The assertion failure in  Issue 608946  is firing frequently on the
commit queue, and the flaky retry mechanism isn't working for this
failure mode.

BUG= 608923 ,  608946 
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.mac:mac_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.win:win_optional_gpu_tests_rel
TBR=danakj@chromium.org, sclittle@chromium.org
NOTRY=true

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1947303002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#391712}

[modify] https://crrev.com/0795777fbf9349b39b0c66704e5ce7633add15b8/content/test/gpu/gpu_tests/context_lost_expectations.py

Labels: -Sheriff-Chromium
Project Member

Comment 12 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, May 6 2016

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/a76f4435305e2b1a7fa0c8a5e0c5ae9cdde9755c

commit a76f4435305e2b1a7fa0c8a5e0c5ae9cdde9755c
Author: danakj <danakj@chromium.org>
Date: Fri May 06 22:57:36 2016

Revert of Skip GpuCrash.GPUProcessCrashesExactlyOnce on all platforms. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1947303002/ )

Reason for revert:
Temporary fix here: https://codereview.chromium.org/1949753007/

More work to come.

Original issue's description:
> Skip GpuCrash.GPUProcessCrashesExactlyOnce on all platforms.
>
> The assertion failure in  Issue 608946  is firing frequently on the
> commit queue, and the flaky retry mechanism isn't working for this
> failure mode.
>
> BUG= 608923 ,  608946 
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.mac:mac_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.win:win_optional_gpu_tests_rel
> TBR=danakj@chromium.org, sclittle@chromium.org
> NOTRY=true
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/0795777fbf9349b39b0c66704e5ce7633add15b8
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#391712}

TBR=sclittle@chromium.org,kbr@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG= 608923 ,  608946 

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1956703007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#392193}

[modify] https://crrev.com/a76f4435305e2b1a7fa0c8a5e0c5ae9cdde9755c/content/test/gpu/gpu_tests/context_lost_expectations.py

Project Member

Comment 13 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, May 10 2016

Labels: Sheriff-Chromium
Detected 3 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app. Since flakiness is ongoing, the issue was moved back into Sheriff Bug Queue (unless already there).

Comment 14 by kbr@chromium.org, May 10 2016

The new flakes above are instances of  Issue 606112 .

Project Member

Comment 15 by bugdroid1@chromium.org, May 13 2016

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/889fa48ee6cbe56579a77382232eaef9293816c2

commit 889fa48ee6cbe56579a77382232eaef9293816c2
Author: dyen <dyen@chromium.org>
Date: Fri May 13 06:14:26 2016

Tentatively enable flaky GpuCrash.GPUProcessCrashesExactlyOnce again.

R=kbr@chromium.org
BUG= 608923 ,  606112 
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.mac:mac_optional_gpu_tests_rel;tryserver.chromium.win:win_optional_gpu_tests_rel

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1971403002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#393454}

[modify] https://crrev.com/889fa48ee6cbe56579a77382232eaef9293816c2/content/test/gpu/gpu_tests/context_lost_expectations.py

Labels: -Sheriff-Chromium
Project Member

Comment 17 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, May 17 2016

Labels: Sheriff-Chromium
Detected 3 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app. Since flakiness is ongoing, the issue was moved back into Sheriff Bug Queue (unless already there).

Comment 18 by kbr@chromium.org, May 18 2016

Owner: dyen@chromium.org
Assigning to dyen to triage the recent failures.

Labels: -Sheriff-Chromium
Already assigned, no need for Sheriff label.

Comment 20 by dyen@chromium.org, May 18 2016

Blockedon: 612866
Project Member

Comment 21 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, May 19 2016

Labels: Sheriff-Chromium
Detected 3 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app. Since flakiness is ongoing, the issue was moved back into Sheriff Bug Queue (unless already there).

Comment 22 by kbr@chromium.org, May 19 2016

Cc: vmi...@chromium.org
Components: Internals>GPU>Internals
The three recent flakes are of GpuCrash.GPUProcessCrashesExactlyOnce:

https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_ng/builds/224347
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_ng/builds/223414
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_ng/builds/223446

They happen on Win/AMD and Win/NVIDIA.

One new failure mode seems to be in gpu::gles2::FeatureInfo::InitializeFeatures (though the stack could be somewhat bogus):

[4532:3724:0517/163538:ERROR:command_buffer_proxy_impl.cc(236)] Failed to send GpuChannelMsg_CreateCommandBuffer.
[4532:3724:0517/163538:ERROR:context_provider_command_buffer.cc(161)] GpuChannelHost failed to create command buffer.
[5116:5060:0517/163538:INFO:CONSOLE(0)] "WebGL: CONTEXT_LOST_WEBGL: loseContext: context lost", source: http://127.0.0.1:59054/gpu_process_crash.html (0)
Backtrace:
	(No symbol) [0x3036392E]
	(No symbol) [0x5BE434E1]
	gpu::gles2::FeatureInfo::InitializeFeatures [0x5CF645E4+4037]
	RtlInterlockedFlushSList [0x77B03417+3202]
	RtlInterlockedFlushSList [0x77B03022+2189]
	RtlInterlockedFlushSList [0x77B02FFE+2153]
	RtlAllocateHeap [0x77AFE0F2+172]
	HeapFree [0x76A614BD+20]
	free [0x5C5C292C+20]
	std::_Deallocate [0x5C5BC512+72]
	base::Time::NowFromSystemTime [0x5F2211FF+303]

...
[3240:2084:0517/163545:ERROR:command_buffer_proxy_impl.cc(236)] Failed to send GpuChannelMsg_CreateCommandBuffer.
[3240:2084:0517/163545:ERROR:context_provider_command_buffer.cc(161)] GpuChannelHost failed to create command buffer.
[5116:5060:0517/163545:INFO:CONSOLE(22)] "Failed to fetch WebGL context", source: http://127.0.0.1:59054/gpu_process_crash.html (22)
...
[2808:4668:0517/163545:ERROR:context_provider_command_buffer.cc(190)] Failed to initialize GLES2Implementation.
[4424:4852:0517/163545:ERROR:gles2_cmd_decoder.cc(15078)] [.Offscreen-MainThread-08367660]GL ERROR :GL_INVALID_OPERATION : glCreateAndConsumeTextureCHROMIUM: invalid mailbox name
[4424:4852:0517/163545:ERROR:gles2_cmd_decoder.cc(8222)] [.Offscreen-MainThread-08367660]RENDER WARNING: texture bound to texture unit 0 is not renderable. It maybe non-power-of-2 and have incompatible texture filtering.
Waiting for page to finish.
Waiting for page to finish.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\users\chrome~1\appdata\local\temp\runuctgor\third_party\catapult\telemetry\telemetry\internal\story_runner.py", line 84, in _RunStoryAndProcessErrorIfNeeded
    state.RunStory(results)
  File "c:\users\chrome~1\appdata\local\temp\runuctgor\content\test\gpu\gpu_tests\gpu_test_base.py", line 111, in RunStory
    RunStoryWithRetries(GpuSharedPageState, self, results)
  File "c:\users\chrome~1\appdata\local\temp\runuctgor\content\test\gpu\gpu_tests\gpu_test_base.py", line 72, in RunStoryWithRetries
    super(cls, shared_page_state).RunStory(results)
  File "c:\users\chrome~1\appdata\local\temp\runuctgor\third_party\catapult\telemetry\telemetry\page\shared_page_state.py", line 332, in RunStory
    self._current_page, self._current_tab, results)
  File "c:\users\chrome~1\appdata\local\temp\runuctgor\content\test\gpu\gpu_tests\context_lost.py", line 118, in ValidateAndMeasurePage
    'Test failed (didn\'t render content properly?)')
Failure: Test failed (didn't render content properly?)

[  FAILED  ] GpuCrash.GPUProcessCrashesExactlyOnce (14232 ms)


Not sure what's going on here.

It's important that this test not be disabled completely because that will lose coverage. Perhaps it should be marked as flaky again on Windows.

Labels: -Sheriff-Chromium
Already assigned, no need for Sheriff label.

Comment 24 by dyen@chromium.org, May 19 2016

Blockedon: 613229
Project Member

Comment 25 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, May 21 2016

Detected 3 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app. Since flakiness is ongoing, the issue was moved back into Sheriff Bug Queue (unless already there).
Project Member

Comment 26 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, May 24 2016

Detected 3 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app. Since flakiness is ongoing, the issue was moved back into Sheriff Bug Queue (unless already there).

Comment 27 by kbr@chromium.org, May 24 2016

Recent flakes =>  Issue 613229 

Owner: vmi...@chromium.org

Comment 29 by kbr@chromium.org, May 24 2016

Labels: Hotlist-PixelWrangler
Project Member

Comment 30 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, May 25 2016

Detected 9 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app. Since flakiness is ongoing, the issue was moved back into Sheriff Bug Queue (unless already there).

Comment 31 by kbr@chromium.org, May 25 2016

These flakes are under the umbrella of  Issue 613229 .

Project Member

Comment 32 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, May 26 2016

Detected 5 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app. Since flakiness is ongoing, the issue was moved back into Sheriff Bug Queue (unless already there).
Project Member

Comment 33 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, May 31 2016

Detected 3 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.

Comment 34 by kbr@chromium.org, Jun 1 2016

Blockedon: 614526
All of those flakes are due to lack of capacity on the Swarming Windows slaves, covered in Issue 614526.

Project Member

Comment 35 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 2 2016

Detected 5 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.
Project Member

Comment 36 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 3 2016

Detected 27 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.

Comment 37 by kbr@chromium.org, Jun 3 2016

The massive number of failures above seem to have been caused by the Swarming pool being overloaded. This should be alleviated soon by new machines coming online in Issue 614526.

Project Member

Comment 38 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 7 2016

Detected 3 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.

Comment 39 by kbr@chromium.org, Jun 8 2016

Blockedon: 617847
The flakes in #38 were  Issue 617847 .

Project Member

Comment 40 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 8 2016

Detected 8 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.

Comment 41 by kbr@chromium.org, Jun 9 2016

Again,  Issue 617847 .

Project Member

Comment 42 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 10 2016

Detected 3 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.

Comment 43 by kbr@chromium.org, Jun 10 2016

Blockedon: 619196

Comment 44 by kbr@chromium.org, Jun 10 2016

Filed  Issue 619196  about these new flakes.

Project Member

Comment 45 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 11 2016

Detected 9 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.
Project Member

Comment 46 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 13 2016

Detected 3 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.

Comment 47 by kbr@chromium.org, Jun 13 2016

Blocking: 603329
Project Member

Comment 48 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 14 2016

Detected 22 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.

Comment 49 by kbr@chromium.org, Jun 17 2016

Those flakes were all  Issue 619196 .

Project Member

Comment 50 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 22 2016

Detected 4 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.

Comment 51 by kbr@chromium.org, Jun 23 2016

Those flakes were capacity issues being addressed in Issue 614526.

Project Member

Comment 52 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 11 2016

Detected 3 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.

Comment 53 by kbr@chromium.org, Jul 11 2016

Owner: enne@chromium.org
The recent flakes of this test indicate that the browser is failing to start, which is a serious problem. Example failures of this kind:

https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_ng/builds/252901
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_ng/builds/252910
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_ng/builds/252768

It looks like the GPU process might be crashing based on the hardware_accelerated_feature_tests failures in https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_ng/builds/252768 .

enne, as pixel wrangler this week could you please look in the logs and changelogs from today to see if there are any suspect changes which might be taking down the browser, or evidence elsewhere on the waterfalls (maybe the Perf waterfall) of similar hangs? Thanks.

Cc: enne@chromium.org
Owner: kbr@chromium.org
I'm no longer seeing these failures
https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.win/builders/win_chromium_rel_ng

Should we close?

Project Member

Comment 55 by chromium...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 11 2016

Detected 6 new flakes for test/step "context_lost_tests (with patch)". To see the actual flakes, please visit https://chromium-try-flakes.appspot.com/all_flake_occurrences?key=ahVzfmNocm9taXVtLXRyeS1mbGFrZXNyKgsSBUZsYWtlIh9jb250ZXh0X2xvc3RfdGVzdHMgKHdpdGggcGF0Y2gpDA. This message was posted automatically by the chromium-try-flakes app.

Comment 56 by kbr@chromium.org, Aug 16 2016

Since it looks like these flakes aren't happening any more, closing as WontFix (not reproducible). The flurry of flakes on August 11 were Issue 637081.

Sign in to add a comment