Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
0.135% regression in sizes at 391028:391043 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 10 2016
Suspecting https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/3a7cb89d023799cf759eb06532589d41ed384f2c. rsesek, does that seem reasonable? It's a 3.84MB regression. If not, other possible suspects include: A v8 roll: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/d6b33e9bde819cfbce544e59d00d6d12eace565a A pdfium roll: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/a7b49810b22ebaed37a9290809dd6f21ae6bf453
,
May 10 2016
No, that change is Mac-only so it would not have an impact on Linux.
,
May 10 2016
,
May 23 2016
Bulk-closing sizes regressions as we were looking at the wrong metric, should have been tracking ChromiumChrome/Google Chrome Linux x64/sizes/chrome-stripped/stripped |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@google.com
, May 3 2016