New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 608488 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: May 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

0% regression in sizes at 390908:391006

Project Member Reported by lanwei@google.com, May 2 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by lanwei@google.com, May 2 2016

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=608488

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICglNfBpgoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICglJOdrwoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

Google Chrome Linux x64
Cc: lanwei@chromium.org
Owner: e...@chromium.org
This is a pretty small regression, but let's at least try to confirm where it's coming from.

The revision range is:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/0b4adfd25e307a8a82541556690c9a3e0f4d8b30..5227a7901b098f82a15038cf0d3418fe0711d750

eae@, any change the HarfBuzz roll could have caused this?

Comment 3 by e...@chromium.org, May 10 2016

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Yeah, that seems likely. We're slowly moving some functionality out of Chrome and into harbuzz. During the transition the binary size will be a little higher due to code duplication.

Sign in to add a comment