Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
0% regression in sizes at 390908:391006 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 10 2016
This is a pretty small regression, but let's at least try to confirm where it's coming from. The revision range is: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/0b4adfd25e307a8a82541556690c9a3e0f4d8b30..5227a7901b098f82a15038cf0d3418fe0711d750 eae@, any change the HarfBuzz roll could have caused this?
,
May 10 2016
Yeah, that seems likely. We're slowly moving some functionality out of Chrome and into harbuzz. During the transition the binary size will be a little higher due to code duplication. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@google.com
, May 2 2016