Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
100K regression in sizes on Chrome Linux x64 at 390601:390603 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 6 2016
rkc: looks like https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/a7a149d373a58c0e324353175feb0cefb0cb9c8f regress the Chrome size by 100K. Can you verify this?
,
May 12 2016
Friendly Perf Sheriff Ping. rkc@, could you please check this, if you are not the right person to handle this, please revert back and/or cc anyone who might know.
,
May 12 2016
Hey Prasad, I did take a look but nothing seemed to jump out. I'll have to spend more time removing parts of code to figure out what is causing this. I plan on working on this early next week.
,
May 18 2016
,
May 18 2016
So the only way I see this is if I am building with symbols on the Chrome binary. In that case, yes, symbols do increase the size by about 100k, which is expected since the CL does add a lot of code. When compiling without symbols, these are the sizes I see, At commit ae57706988fb492736785ff91a29478f03accc8b, 166434232 At commit 451dea5a213091d3bc3c90da0433d325739ec5a6, 166436600 A total difference of 2k. If there is any new data that shows otherwise (100k size increase, with a build without symbols), please re-open this. Please do include the GN flags needed to do the build though. This is what I am getting with a default release linux non-component build. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Apr 29 2016