Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.5% regression in blink_perf.events at 390088:390129 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 28 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author scottmg@chromium.org === Hi scottmg@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Turn on assert_no_deps for blink in browser Author : scottmg Commit description: R=brettw@chromium.org BUG= 582206 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1926443002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#390123} Commit : ffb95be04fb4effb750884083cb1c166c5499b7a Date : Wed Apr 27 18:05:14 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@390087 0.0604217 0.000226058 5 good chromium@390108 0.0607515 0.000159184 5 good chromium@390119 0.0599416 0.000464867 5 good chromium@390122 0.0601607 0.000182736 5 good chromium@390123 0.0540433 0.000174236 5 bad <-- chromium@390124 0.05406 0.000275185 5 bad chromium@390129 0.0541687 0.000161585 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 607639 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.events Test Metric: hit-test-lots-of-layers/hit-test-lots-of-layers Relative Change: 10.35% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1288 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9014113217096923040 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5864809728311296 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 28 2016
I don't think that's possible, it's a build-time only debug check.
,
May 9 2016
Looks like this got fixed and subsequently regressed again. I'll try another bisect, but it's probably safe to close this.
,
May 19 2016
Closing given that the graph has recovered subsequently (see attached image). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Apr 28 2016