Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
0.8% regression in sizes at 390055:390057 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 6 2016
3 changes in the revision list. One *reverts* a binary size increase, and one is a small V8 change. keishi, any chance this could be 75da88a74e60c92b4456b06f254aa6919b4dee01?
,
May 12 2016
Friendly perf sheriff ping! keishi@ Could you ples comment on #2.
,
May 13 2016
Maybe? That change basically changes static methods to non-static so I wasn't expecting a binary size increase. Looks like a linux only regression so marking as WontFix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sullivan@chromium.org
, Apr 27 2016