Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
9.6%-47.2% regression in blink_perf.pywebsocket at 389486:389507 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 26 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author rockot@chromium.org === Hi rockot@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Add field trial testing config for MojoChannel Author : rockot Commit description: R=asvitkine@chromium.org BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1918583002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#389497} Commit : bf36f2d46f43eff11f56ea205615f092801b1004 Date : Mon Apr 25 16:47:03 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@389494 97.36 1.2502 5 good chromium@389496 98.9 0.790569 5 good chromium@389497 146.0 1.763519 5 bad <- chromium@389498 144.6 1.773415 5 bad chromium@389501 144.6 2.12132 5 bad chromium@389507 145.48 1.837662 5 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect Bug ID: 606760 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket Test Metric: fetch-send-arraybuffer-window-async-verify/fetch-send-arraybuffer-window-async-verify Relative Change: 49.42% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1265 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9014314074165219232 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5345857688305664 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
May 9 2016
We saw general blob perf issues here as well. Dup of https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=609946
,
May 17 2016
We're done with this experiment past M51. There were several performance improvements after 51 branched, so unless we see regressions on M52+ I don't think there's anything to do here. I'll be turning down the experiment on M51 soon.
,
May 17 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pmeenan@chromium.org
, Apr 26 2016