Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
21.2% regression in v8.infinite_scroll at 386032:386051 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 10 2016
Previous bisect failed. New bisect started here: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013044802218266000 Looking specifically at tumblr, as that seems to be the only page that clearly regressed.
,
May 10 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@386031 39812887 12736561 12 good chromium@386051 57595555 18915055 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 606297 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests v8.infinite_scroll Test Metric: End-memory_allocator_v8_renderer/tumblr Relative Change: 24.66% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2178 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013044802218266000 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5848733699276800 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
May 12 2016
Bisect bot cannot reproduce regression. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ulan@google.com
, Apr 25 2016