Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4% regression in jetstream at 387897:387924 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionReference graph might show a similar regression, but it's very small compared to the Score test. Reference graph could just show a noise, but test graph does not look like.
,
Apr 25 2016
The first bisect fails with "Failed steps failed gathering reference values.performance test 1 of 5 failed gathering reference values.reading chartjson results", and the second bisect is running.
,
Apr 26 2016
kicked another bisect because the blocking issue was fixed
,
May 11 2016
Hum... result wasn't reported automatically. Here is a copy and paste from the report page. chromium@387905,v8@a0d2f240c3187.6 0.547723 5 good chromium@387905,v8@139617b0d5185.4 0.547723 5 bad Assign to mstarzinger@ who landed 139617b0d5185, but we may need another v8 bisect to find more accurate revision? CC: prasadv@ as a today's bot sheriff to triage the issue that result wasn't reported, also could help to run another v8 bisect?
,
May 11 2016
IIUC, then there are 24 CLs in the regression range mentioned in comment #4. https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+log/a0d2f240c3..139617b0d5
,
Jun 1 2016
Moving this nonessential bug to the next milestone. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Jul 12 2016
This issue has been moved once and is lower than Pri-1. Removing the milestone. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Oct 11 2016
Perf sheriff ping
,
Oct 17 2016
Looking at the results from a wider time range, this appears likely to have been noise. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Apr 25 2016