veyron_mickey build has been failing for some time. |
|||||||||||
Issue descriptionNo good builds have been produced for veyron_mickey at least since M52 because ToT, and likely longer. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/entry?labels=Infra-ChromeOS,current-issue,Pri-2,Type-Bug,OS-Chrome
,
Apr 18 2016
,
Apr 18 2016
,
Apr 18 2016
Sorry the link should have been: https://cros-goldeneye.corp.google.com/console/listBuild?boards=veyron-mickey&milestone=52&chromeOsVersion=&chromeVersion=&startTimeFrom=&startTimeTo=#/
,
Apr 18 2016
From https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromeos/builders/veyron-c-release-group/builds/1279 it looks like chromeos-bootimage is failing on brain which is causing the build group to fail: ... chromeos-bootimage-0.0.2-r985: Command failed: /usr/bin/cbfstool out.dev/coreboot-full.rom add-payload -f /build/veyron_brain/firmware/depthcharge/dev.elf -n fallback/payload -c lzma chromeos-bootimage-0.0.2-r985: Performing operation on 'COREBOOT' region... chromeos-bootimage-0.0.2-r985: E: Could not add [/build/veyron_brain/firmware/depthcharge/dev.elf, 82555 bytes (80 KB)@0x0]; too big? chromeos-bootimage-0.0.2-r985: E: Failed to add '/build/veyron_brain/firmware/depthcharge/dev.elf' into ROM image. chromeos-bootimage-0.0.2-r985: E: Failed while operating on 'COREBOOT' region! chromeos-bootimage-0.0.2-r985: E: The image will be left unmodified. ... +dhendrix is this in your jurisdiction?
,
Apr 19 2016
Yes - The fix is simple, but kinda ugly since we need to make a small change in 3 different areas. Here's how it went on Romy: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/338027/ https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/338095/ https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/338152/ Mickey is obviously still an important platform, so I've uploaded fixes here: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/339542/ https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/339495/ https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/339511/ This also gives us an opportunity to eliminate some obsolete veyron platforms, specifically veyron_{brain,danger,emile,romy}. The ones that haven't been fixed yet will stop working anyway and it's probably not worth fixing them.
,
Apr 19 2016
I'm just curious - veyron_mickey can be built till 4/7. What firmware patch cause it break and why does increasing cbfs size fix this issue?
,
Apr 19 2016
,
Apr 19 2016
So should we turn down the builders for brain, danger, emile and romy? If that is the case we should file another bug to get that done.
,
Apr 25 2016
The build still doesn't work. I agree that we should turn down the builders for obsolete veyron platform.
,
Apr 25 2016
W.R.T. the build for Mickey not working, it's because the coreboot ebuild keeps getting uprevved before https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/339511 makes its way thru the CQ :-/ Does anyone know of an easier way to handle uprevving an ebuild?
,
Apr 25 2016
It looks like veyron-c build group is blocked by Brain, not Mickey: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromeos/builders/veyron-c-release-group/builds/1299
,
Apr 25 2016
,
Apr 27 2016
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/overlays/chromiumos-overlay/+/03c60982605574cb70d0f676f94eb3d07b77bbc5 commit 03c60982605574cb70d0f676f94eb3d07b77bbc5 Author: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Date: Tue Apr 26 18:22:32 2016 veyron_mickey: Increase RO CBFS size by 512 Kb This change increases the size of RO CBFS by 512 Kb to accommodate new images added to the INSERT screen. (This does the same thing as Daisuke's CL:338027, but for Mickey) BUG= chromium:604412 BRANCH=none CQ-DEPEND=CL:339542,CL:339495 TEST=emerge-veyron_mickey chromeos-bootimage Change-Id: Id61013f9d0bcac7d13288332403e42217de620b3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/339511 Commit-Ready: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> [modify] https://crrev.com/03c60982605574cb70d0f676f94eb3d07b77bbc5/sys-boot/coreboot/files/configs/config.veyron_mickey
,
Apr 27 2016
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/depthcharge/+/d20ef8186c334a2738a1fae04e04d84b1bfca538 commit d20ef8186c334a2738a1fae04e04d84b1bfca538 Author: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Date: Tue Apr 19 01:46:10 2016 veyron_mickey: Increase RO CBFS size by 512 Kb This change increases the size of RO CBFS by 512 Kb to accommodate new images added to the INSERT screen. (This does the same thing as Daisuke's CL:338152, but for Mickey) BUG= chromium:604412 BRANCH=none CQ-DEPEND=CL:339542,CL:339511 TEST=emerge-veyron_mickey chromeos-bootimage Change-Id: Ia1a61f2f5e78d2653305a05bb0f5d0b99ce562bc Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/339495 Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> [modify] https://crrev.com/d20ef8186c334a2738a1fae04e04d84b1bfca538/board/veyron_mickey/fmap.dts
,
Apr 27 2016
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/coreboot/+/897499bea5bd4003466ca7ebabff597e87da2e45 commit 897499bea5bd4003466ca7ebabff597e87da2e45 Author: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Date: Tue Apr 19 01:44:09 2016 veyron_mickey: Increase RO CBFS size by 512 Kb This change increases the size of RO CBFS by 512 Kb to accommodate new images added to the INSERT screen. (This does the same thing as Daisuke's CL:338095, but for Mickey) BUG= chromium:604412 BRANCH=none CQ-DEPEND=CL:339495,CL:339511 TEST=emerge-veyron_mickey chromeos-bootimage Change-Id: I2cee79b2476fcb5bfb91bf9779f1fe11b4361612 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/339542 Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> [modify] https://crrev.com/897499bea5bd4003466ca7ebabff597e87da2e45/src/mainboard/google/veyron_mickey/chromeos.fmd
,
May 18 2016
,
May 23 2016
Bulk verified
,
May 23 2016
bulk verified
,
Jul 31 2016
|
|||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||
Comment 1 by haddowk@chromium.org
, Apr 18 2016