Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Chrome 50 Change in implicit table-cell height behaviour
Reported by
bpoz...@gmail.com,
Apr 15 2016
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/50.0.2661.75 Safari/537.36 Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. See jsFiddle https://jsfiddle.net/zc21pg9q/1/ 2. Open in Chrome 49, the div fills the table cell 3. Open in Chrome 50, the div does not fill the table cell What is the expected behavior? I would expect the div to fill the table cell. What went wrong? Since Chrome 50, table cells do not implicitly inherit their parents percentage heights. Did this work before? Yes Chrome 49 Chrome version: 50.0.2661.75 Channel: stable OS Version: 10.0 Flash Version: Shockwave Flash 21.0 r0 This has been an issue for us in Firefox and earlier versions of IE. Chrome, Safari and IE11 have always shown the correct behaviour. Chrome 50 this is not the case.
,
Apr 15 2016
I can confirm the behavior on Chrome 50.0.2638.0 (64-bit) on OS X El Capitan.
,
Apr 15 2016
Fix ASAP please, affects everything!!
,
Apr 16 2016
I disagree that this is expected behavior. All other browser handle it as chrome did in 49 and earlier. We have a big company platform web application in production that is affected by this at the moment. Would appreciate it, if this could be looked at. Thanks, Janett
,
Apr 16 2016
The justification in this bug report is that the change is "more spec compliant". https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=583670&q=label%3ACr-Blink-Layout-Table&colspec=ID%20Pri%20M%20Stars%20ReleaseBlock%20Cr%20Status%20Owner%20Summary%20OS%20Modified However IE11 and Edge moved away from this behaviour to join the same behaviour as Chrome (previously), Safari and Opera. Leaving Firefox behind. Mozilla appear to acknowledge this behaviour as a bug in this open report since 1999: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10212 I'm surprised there hasn't been huge uproar surrounding this change as I'm sure there will be thousands of sites broken by this. Even Google Hangouts has been affected. The offered workaround is fine in isolation, however for those of us dealing with large scale legacy applications this is a disaster. I have provided a temporary workaround for others who may need an emergency fix for this issue. However I hope that this will not be permanently required. http://brettpostin.com/2016/04/16/chrome-50-and-table-cell-percentage-heights/
,
Apr 16 2016
,
Apr 18 2016
This "fix" to be more compliant is causing a major disaster for our production SPA app of over 1000 users. While we can add display: table-cell to affected divs, this is not enough; the fixed height of the parent table is ignored when height: 100% is added to a table-cell, and whereas previously the cell's inner content would scroll, keeping the page always at 100% height, now the entire page expands so that a particular cell can show 100% of its content. The various overflow properties don't seem to override this behavior. This is causing quite a problem for our users who are upgrading to the latest Chrome.
,
Apr 18 2016
I'm rather dumbfounded that automatic updates to Chrome 50 are happening for our users. A very popular browser rendering service we use, Browserstack, lists Chrome 50 as a development branch, and it's so new that the service doesn't even offer Chrome 50 for any versions of Windows yet, only OSX. Why is Google automatically moving everyone to this release when it's still in beta? This was a significant error to force everyone into such an upgrade.
,
Apr 18 2016
Issue 604396 has been merged into this issue.
,
Apr 18 2016
,
Apr 18 2016
,
Apr 18 2016
andrew006: Chrome 50 was promoted to stable 5 days ago. You can check what version of Chrome is stable here: http://omahaproxy.appspot.com/.
,
Apr 18 2016
,
Apr 30 2016
Another issue suggests that related behavior to what I and several others mentioned might indeed by reverted in the most recent version of Chrome: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=605257
,
Apr 30 2016
indonesia 30 Apr 2016 20.58, "andrew006@gmail.com via Monorail" <monorail@chromium.org> menulis: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by yurk...@gmail.com
, Apr 15 2016