Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.1% regression in page_cycler.intl_ar_fa_he at 386274:386281 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 13 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@386273 35450.33333355.73449 3 good chromium@386281 35459.8 73.377108 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 602767 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.intl_ar_fa_he Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser Relative Change: 0.12% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2130 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9015552272746228880 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=602767 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 13 2016
Looks like moar Android bot weirdness, as recent measurements are below the regression-alert level. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by m...@chromium.org
, Apr 12 2016