Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.4% regression in blink_perf.parser at 385618:385654 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 11 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@385617 1659.429239 21.482124 12 good chromium@385654 1656.875151 19.140512 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 602327 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.parser Test Metric: query-selector-all-id-deep/query-selector-all-id-deep Relative Change: 0.31% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1263 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9015660568716648944 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=602327 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 18 2016
re-kicked bisect with modified range.
,
Apr 26 2016
Recovered on 4/11 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rsch...@chromium.org
, Apr 11 2016