Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.2% regression in page_cycler.intl_ko_th_vi at 385650:385694 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 11 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@385649 37678.375 1044.469645 8 good chromium@385694 37554.666667641.816381 6 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 602323 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.intl_ko_th_vi Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser Relative Change: 1.44% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/71 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9015660710924307552 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=602323 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 18 2016
re-kicked bisect with modified range.
,
Apr 26 2016
re-kicked again (though the 5X bots may be offline so I'm not sure results will come in)
,
Apr 26 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Add a new performance benchmark test for postMessage Author : peria Commit description: BUG= 148757 TEST=tools/perf/run_benchmark run blink_perf.bindings Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1871463002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#385719} Commit : f4ff9e2d8d11f1c4d2225c37dddc4c755dbd2c32 Date : Thu Apr 07 12:16:06 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@385658 153.172481 4.720318 5 good chromium@385704 144.792275 2.526721 5 good chromium@385716 143.427835 3.32854 5 good chromium@385718 151.970744 7.056536 5 good chromium@385719 125.72471 8.466576 5 bad <- chromium@385722 111.345697 12.984957 5 bad chromium@385727 122.500135 21.781963 5 bad chromium@385750 102.129531 20.011779 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 602323 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Test Metric: set-attribute-rare/set-attribute-rare Relative Change: 33.32% Score: 99.0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/120 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9014308717187889488 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5831486419238912 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rsch...@chromium.org
, Apr 11 2016