Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.3% regression in blink_perf.pywebsocket at 385710:385738 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 11 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@385709 1404.691667 17.342615 12 good chromium@385738 1406.9 8.373939 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 602322 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket Test Metric: fetch-receive-blob-worker-async-verify/fetch-receive-blob-worker-async-verify Relative Change: 0.90% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1730 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9015660720590488032 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=602322 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 14 2016
,
Apr 14 2016
Merging report for android-nexus7v2.
,
Apr 14 2016
,
Apr 14 2016
The increase is slight. I've changed this to P3 for now. https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=603254 https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=602322 https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=40c2104ba4e6055904cfb0d01a7585585b2d4c517b495aae02e0b12a4f833ef0&rev=385709
,
Apr 22 2016
Trying some more bisects.
,
May 6 2016
Kicked off another bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013373171070949312
,
May 7 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@385700 1407.59 13.7807 12 good chromium@385738 1391.46 15.3965 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 602322 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket Test Metric: fetch-receive-blob-worker-async-verify/fetch-receive-blob-worker-async-verify Relative Change: 0.33% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1780 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9013373171070949312 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5870874457014272 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
May 12 2016
Bisect gave up with 8 and 12 samples Re-kicked another bisect: https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1790
,
May 13 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@385709 1417.33 17.8724 12 good chromium@385738 1419.4 8.81103 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 602322 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket Test Metric: fetch-receive-blob-worker-async-verify/fetch-receive-blob-worker-async-verify Relative Change: 0.35% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1790 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9012831968042227136 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5832169084157952 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Oct 11 2016
Perf sheriff ping
,
Oct 20 2016
Blocked on issue 598215 , no need to triage this until that issue is resolved, I believe.
,
Feb 3 2017
Only failed on N9s. WontFix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rsch...@chromium.org
, Apr 11 2016