Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
key_mobile_sites tests failing on all Android bots |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionRevision range first seen: 7591d9bd0133dea903ed6a8d61271e117c7abc7d to 6fc74a4c919c3cd64aea4c0d77ead066b3fa8370 Link to failing step log: https://uberchromegw.corp.google.com/i/chromium.perf/builders/Android%20Galaxy%20S5%20Perf%20%281%29/builds/2246/steps/blink_style.key_mobile_sites/logs/stdio If the test is disabled, please downgrade to Pri-2. I'm going to kick off a return code bisect.
,
Apr 11 2016
This time again, with the *right* revision range: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9015658757004859504
,
Apr 11 2016
,
Apr 11 2016
And _this_ time, with the right revision _and_ the right bisect type (return code): https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9015655100136325744
,
Apr 11 2016
Reduced repeat count to 5 at eakuefner's suggestion: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9015652120733135440
,
Apr 11 2016
(Also, the actual revision range is 384314 to 384620)
,
Apr 12 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author wnwen@chromium.org === Hi wnwen@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Propagate is_official_build to version script. Author : wnwen Commit description: OFFICIAL_BUILD is a special variable in the version script which takes its value from the environment variable. This means that local builds with is_official_build will not actually result in ChromeVersionConstants.isOfficialBuild() returning true. This CL propagates the is_official_build truthiness to the script so official builds no longer depend solely on the environment variable. BUG= 599268 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1838173005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#384340} Commit : eab85df0275b825e428954c4030e358ce968ecd9 Date : Thu Mar 31 18:36:33 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Exit Code Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@384314 0 N/A 5 good chromium@384334 0 N/A 5 good chromium@384339 0 N/A 5 good chromium@384340 1 N/A 5 bad <- chromium@384341 1 N/A 5 bad chromium@384342 1 N/A 5 bad chromium@384344 1 N/A 5 bad chromium@384353 1 N/A 5 bad chromium@384391 1 N/A 5 bad chromium@384467 1 N/A 5 bad chromium@384620 1 N/A 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 602297 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_style.key_mobile_sites Test Metric: parse_css_enormous_tokens/http___www.boingboing.net Relative Change: Zero to non-zero Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/593 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9015652120733135440 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=602297 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 12 2016
This CL was reverted and relanded after fixing the root cause.
,
Apr 15 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by charliea@chromium.org
, Apr 11 2016