Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
16.3% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 384312:384648 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSplitting off from bug 600271
,
Apr 5 2016
,
Apr 6 2016
@sullivan: the bisect job produced nothing usable. Any ideas what happened?
,
Apr 7 2016
I'm not sure what caused that exception. +dtu, any ideas? I kicked off another bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016035756661173792 But I also noticed that: 1) The test has no ref build 2) The test recovered on its own, but at a different revision than the other tests in this bug recovered 3) The blink_perf.canvas regression is only on one device, the N5 We've been having a LOT of trouble with the N5s this week, I think they are hooked into a bad USB hub. But this change in results could be due to device swaps.
,
Apr 7 2016
Okay, thanks. If it is a device issue, then the bisect should confirm that the regression was imaginary. I'll wait for that confirmation before closing.
,
Apr 7 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@384311 130.403666 1.725969 18 good chromium@384648 130.589912 1.380696 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 600786 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas Test Metric: putImageData/putImageData Relative Change: 1.29% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3583 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016035756661173792 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=600786 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2016
Yep, bisect couldn't reproduce |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sullivan@chromium.org
, Apr 5 2016