All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=600654

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgyPmEtQoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus6

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision                Mean Value  Std. Dev.   Num Values  Good?
chromium@384839         776.999321  12.73657    9           good
chromium@384843         776.950046  15.181835   12          bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 600654

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.morejs
Test Metric: warm_times/page_load_time
Relative Change: 0.30%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2092
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016239032478622256


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=600654

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Looks like the ref build moved at the same times as the build under test. This must have been a device issue.