Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
6.1% regression in v8.mobile_infinite_scroll at 383932:383948 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 5 2016
,
Apr 5 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@383931 15818526.6667182591.10349312 good chromium@383948 15835346.1667360525.24471818 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 600651 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests v8.mobile_infinite_scroll Test Metric: Begin-memory_allocator_v8_renderer/Begin-memory_allocator_v8_renderer Relative Change: 0.88% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/47 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016240422934856512 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=600651 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mlippautz@chromium.org
, Apr 5 2016