some cros devices have invalid hwids |
||||
Issue descriptionhwid generated labels will be broken for certain devices with invalid hwids. Is that ok? example device: - lulu (chromeos1-row2-rack1-host3) # crossystem hwid LULU TEST A-A 7705 - samus (chromeos1-row1-rack1-host2) # crossystem hwid SAMUS TEST 8028 When I try to use these hwids, I get back: "error": "(u'HWID not found SAMUS TEST 8028', HWIDException(\"HWID string u'SAMUS TEST 8028' is neither base32 nor base8192 encoded\",))", "kind": "chromeoshwid#resourcesItem", Are these devices out of luck? Or should their funky hwid also get recognized?
,
Apr 6 2016
Removing myself as the owner, I agree that devices in the lab where the HWID can not decode should either be decommissioned or if there is simply not enough stock of replacement devices we will have to correct the HWID. There might be some exceptions made for very old HWID (v2 v1 ? ) like ALEX but lets discuss that case in a separate bug.
,
Apr 22 2016
Sounds like we'll do this on a case-by-case basis.
,
Apr 27 2016
|
||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||
Comment 1 by jrbarnette@chromium.org
, Apr 4 2016