Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Perf regressions in multiple encode perf tests around 384572:384575 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 4 2016
CL range: http://test-results.appspot.com/revision_range?start=384572&end=384575 I see a WebRTC roll: https://codereview.chromium.org/1850673003 There are 15 CLs in that roll, but nothing immediately stands out. nisse@, there are a couple CLs that look possibly related: https://codereview.webrtc.org/1827023002 https://codereview.webrtc.org/1843413002 Can you take an initial look?
,
Apr 4 2016
Issue 600515 has been merged into this issue.
,
Apr 4 2016
Please note that other tests around the same range also alerted - see the graphs in https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=600515 (i.e. linked in duped bug 600515).
,
Apr 4 2016
,
Apr 5 2016
,
Apr 5 2016
This decreases at the same time as http://crbug.com/600503 , so it's very likely the issues are related.
,
Apr 5 2016
Spoke with perkj@, and it does make sense that turning on the denoiser reduces video quality. Basically, it denoises the barcoded frame from the ref video, then encodes/decodes and captures the frame. However, when we do the PSNR comparison between the captured frame and the source frame we do not apply the denoising step to the source frame, so there will be a quality cost for the denoiser. Since the root cause is the same as 600503 I'm duping this to that bug. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tnakamura@chromium.org
, Apr 4 2016