New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 600486 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Apr 2016
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 1
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3%-161.4% regression in various AbsSendTime* tests at 12203:12203

Project Member Reported by tnakamura@chromium.org, Apr 4 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=600486

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgqJaDvgoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

webrtc-linux-large-tests
Cc: phoglund@chromium.org mflodman@chromium.org
Components: Blink>WebRTC>Video
Labels: -Pri-2 -M-49 M-51 Pri-1
Owner: skvlad@chromium.org
r12203 == https://codereview.webrtc.org/1826093004, which fixes the alerts in  bug 597332 . :|

skvlad@, can you take a look? (I'm also cc'ing this week's perf sheriff)
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
This is the expected behavior. The original change caused regressions in some tests and unexpected improvements in others (such as https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=597714) as it changed the timing of the first RTCP packet. The fix in r12203 restores the original timing and therefore reverts everything back to the state it was >1 week ago. If you zoom out on the graph you can see the original change that caused the unexpected improvement.

These tests measure the time it takes to ramp up to the target bandwidth utilization. Changing RTCP packet timing affects that time, but does not really result in an actual performance improvement.
Cc: skvlad@chromium.org kjellander@chromium.org
 Issue 600489  has been merged into this issue.
Cc: holmer@chromium.org

Sign in to add a comment