Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.4% regression in blink_perf.pywebsocket at 384299:384651 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 4 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@384298 1776.2 52.082682 8 good chromium@384651 1735.6875 51.629212 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 600267 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket Test Metric: fetch-receive-text-window-async-verify/fetch-receive-text-window-async-verify Relative Change: 1.69% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3554 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016324776561250976 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=600267 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 5 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@384298 1819.125 40.452009 8 good chromium@384651 1826.5 46.947509 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 600267 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket Test Metric: fetch-receive-text-window-async-verify/fetch-receive-text-window-async-verify Relative Change: 0.63% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3568 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016239758733736000 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=600267 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 5 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@384298 2661.9375 72.453649 8 good chromium@384651 2624.225 57.663129 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 600267 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket Test Metric: XHR-send-arraybuffer-window-sync-verify/XHR-send-arraybuffer-window-sync-verify Relative Change: 0.03% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3569 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016212368454032288 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=600267 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 6 2016
Let me close this. The regression was recovered in recent revisions, and I could not reproduce the regression in several bisects. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Apr 4 2016