New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 600267 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Apr 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

14.4% regression in blink_perf.pywebsocket at 384299:384651

Project Member Reported by toyoshim@chromium.org, Apr 4 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=600267

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgiI_kuwoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision                Mean Value  Std. Dev.   Num Values  Good?
chromium@384298         1776.2      52.082682   8           good
chromium@384651         1735.6875   51.629212   8           bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 600267

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket
Test Metric: fetch-receive-text-window-async-verify/fetch-receive-text-window-async-verify
Relative Change: 1.69%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3554
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016324776561250976


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=600267

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision                Mean Value  Std. Dev.   Num Values  Good?
chromium@384298         1819.125    40.452009   8           good
chromium@384651         1826.5      46.947509   8           bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 600267

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket
Test Metric: fetch-receive-text-window-async-verify/fetch-receive-text-window-async-verify
Relative Change: 0.63%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3568
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016239758733736000


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=600267

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision                Mean Value  Std. Dev.   Num Values  Good?
chromium@384298         2661.9375   72.453649   8           good
chromium@384651         2624.225    57.663129   8           bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 600267

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket
Test Metric: XHR-send-arraybuffer-window-sync-verify/XHR-send-arraybuffer-window-sync-verify
Relative Change: 0.03%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3569
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016212368454032288


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=600267

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Let me close this.
The regression was recovered in recent revisions, and I could not reproduce the regression in several bisects.

Sign in to add a comment