Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
84.3% regression in smoothness.tough_filters_cases at 384315:384399 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 8 2016
Looks like bisect aborted prematurely. Sent another.
,
Apr 15 2016
Bisect still not working right. Trying another one...
,
May 4 2016
Re-kicked bisect with wider revision range. Details on the below link: ---------------------------- https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=599857 Thank you!
,
May 10 2016
,
Jun 3 2016
Kicked off another bisect
,
Jul 8 2016
Trying another bisect.
,
Jul 19 2016
,
Oct 7 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999426075453407056
,
Oct 7 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1087 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Oct 25 2016
Need to dig into this a bit more.
,
Dec 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8993719000903013840
,
Dec 9 2016
benhenry@ did you get a chance to look more into this? Given that the blocking issue is fixed. I kicked another one.
,
Dec 9 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1162 Failure reason: the build has failed due to infrastructure failure.
,
Dec 15 2016
This bot has been decommissioned.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982592593817522992 |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by majidvp@chromium.org
, Apr 1 2016