Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4%-30.7% regression in a few 720p_H264 tests at 383461:383999 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 31 2016
,
Mar 31 2016
CL range: http://test-results.appspot.com/revision_range?start=383461&end=383999 There is some overlap with the CL range mentioned in bug 599569, but I've filed a separate bugs for these graphs in case there are two distinct causes. One big difference related to the CL ranges is that this bug's range includes a WebRTC roll (https://codereview.chromium.org/1839343002). Changes in that roll: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/trunk/webrtc.git/+log/ce55976..80eacc6 Nothing obvious stands out, though. hbos@, can you take a look?
,
Mar 31 2016
I think I know what this is, that machine was upgraded from 10.9 to 10.10 at March 30, which fits with the regression. I'll leave it to hbos@ to close the bug though (in case there may be something else).
,
Apr 1 2016
What about chromium-webrtc-rel-win10 and chromium-webrtc-trunk-tot-rel-mac of which the other two regression bugs concern? (https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=599569 and https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=599580)
,
Apr 4 2016
My comment #4 only touches the Mac machines of chromium.webrtc[.fyi]. I posted a similar comment in bug 599580 now (sorry I thought I did that last week but apparently I missed that one). The Windows one is likely a true regression, I'm most certain the Mac ones are caused by the machine environmental changes.
,
Apr 4 2016
,
Apr 4 2016
,
Apr 12 2016
Closing due to numbers explainable by upgrade. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tnakamura@chromium.org
, Mar 31 2016