Bisect "Reproduced a change" of 0.00% (+/-0.00%) |
|||
Issue descriptionWhat steps will reproduce the problem? (1) Ran a bisect with a metric that did *not* change. (See output below.) https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3520 What is the expected output? Bisect should complain that no change was reproduced. And most certainly not blame some random CL in the range. What do you see instead? ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: Positive: Reproduced a change. Test Command: tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=buildbot --also-run-disabled-tests memory.memory_health_plan --pageset-repeat 5 Test Metric: foreground-memory_android_memtrack_gl_gpu_process/http_yahoo_com Relative Change: 0.00% (+/-0.00%) Estimated Confidence: 99.90% Retested CL with revert: Yes ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Use task runner instead of message loop in WifiDataProvider. Author : mvanouwerkerk@chromium.org Link : https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/cb9d633e2f1f1f13881899fa92f356bf8cd79e02 Commit : cb9d633e2f1f1f13881899fa92f356bf8cd79e02 Date : Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:03:01 +0000 ===== RETEST RESULTS ===== ToT 18599936.00 +-0.00 Reverted 18599936.00 +-0.00 ===== TESTED COMMITS ===== Depot Position SHA Mean Std. Error State chromium 380426 236e6e14f9521698f801c74d34cb0621c3ccf8d7 18599936.00 +-0.00 Bad chromium 380414 4146624afda978a7f78e81eac9ac613d488f4827 18599936.00 +-0.00 Bad chromium 380408 fe36ec4d077c3a89979854bf37328dd41bb24ca6 18599936.00 +-0.00 Bad chromium 380405 ff323ec5588d6e61a4267ab32251cf2310c84533 18599936.00 +-0.00 Bad chromium 380403 fd7ede807eb0e64820c805e8d5d0caf7ba9c5516 18599936.00 +-0.00 Bad chromium 380402 cb9d633e2f1f1f13881899fa92f356bf8cd79e02 18599936.00 +-0.00 Suspected CL chromium 380401 ed16d0afb92f998cad2cdd60543037f09e150263 18599936.00 +-0.00 Good Average build time : 0:00:51 Average test time : 1:23:14 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with label Cr-Tests-AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Mar 29 2016
How did you kick off the bisect? Looks like it's going through a deprecated code path (non-recipe script-based bisect)
,
Mar 30 2016
Yes, that was a manual config file here: https://codereview.chromium.org/1806583002 using the instructions from Prasad here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TrhCIxtPUOJjcr-60nJonsNuUUNolpUKEoonlKFrWtU/edit Not sure if there is an alternative we could use at this time.
,
Sep 28 2016
,
Feb 3 2017
|
|||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||
Comment 1 by sullivan@chromium.org
, Mar 29 2016Components: Tests>AutoBisect