Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
15.2%-17.6% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 382796:382801 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 30 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author ccameron@chromium.org === Hi ccameron@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Mac: Decode hardware to 420 instead of 422 Author : ccameron Commit description: If the decoded frame is going to be used as a CALayer overlay, then it will never be converted to RGBA. If it is used by OpenGL, then the same infrastructure for software frames will be employed to make an expensive RGBA copy of the frame. BUG= 594452 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1822173002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#382797} Commit : 24da601d444c8822c5ff0a10751b9384f25dd1b4 Date : Wed Mar 23 06:13:40 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@382795 2983.632627 35.874495 5 good chromium@382796 2943.049353 60.490482 5 good chromium@382797 2494.053495 14.985538 5 bad <- Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 597649 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas Test Metric: upload-video-to-texture/upload-video-to-texture Relative Change: 16.41% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2070 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016732549775546432 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=597649 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Apr 1 2016
This CL has been reverted, but it's coming back in. This is an expected regression -- we are intentionally making video canvas rendering higher power in exchange for making video playback lower power.
,
Apr 1 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mustaq@chromium.org
, Mar 24 2016