Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.7% regression in smoothness.tough_pinch_zoom_cases at 382276:382384 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 26 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@382275 18.294369 0.073411 9 good chromium@382384 18.341792 0.115934 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 597644 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_pinch_zoom_cases Test Metric: frame_times/frame_times Relative Change: 0.18% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2065 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9017100819217486496 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=597644 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Mar 28 2016
Started a bisect on ebay since it shows the clearest regression: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016937129021026848
,
Mar 28 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. Author : vmiura Commit description: BUG= 591179 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1817583003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#382394} Commit : b338ee0b3125007b94854e44ed7b6df820c72a75 Date : Mon Mar 21 21:26:30 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@382384 18.27196 0.278374 6 good chromium@382389 18.355769 0.256115 5 good chromium@382392 18.342145 0.175818 5 good chromium@382393 18.531627 0.242717 6 good chromium@382394 29.452206 1.800368 4 bad <- chromium@382404 31.751923 1.353154 4 bad chromium@382424 30.458989 1.750412 6 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 597644 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_pinch_zoom_cases Test Metric: frame_times/http___www.ebay.com Relative Change: 64.81% Score: 99.8 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2067 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016937129021026848 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=597644 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Mar 24 2016