Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.4%-19.7% regression in smoothness.key_silk_cases at 382693:382762 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 30 2016
-RVG (it was marked as restricted because nexus5X wasn't added to the bot whitelist yet).
,
Mar 30 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@382608 143.307633 4.260196 12 good chromium@382724 147.244837 5.288603 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_webview_aosp_perf_bisect Bug ID: 597630 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.key_silk_cases Test Metric: frame_time_discrepancy/frame_time_discrepancy Relative Change: 3.52% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_webview_aosp_perf_bisect/builds/83 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016740943778584400 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=597630 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Mar 31 2016
Kicked off another bisect with a wider range after removing 2 recovered tests from the bug.
,
Apr 8 2016
Trying again with a wider range.
,
Apr 8 2016
Seems we don't have any data beyond Mar16~29 window. Is the bot down? May be that's why the last bisect job stalled?
,
Apr 9 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Handling transition animation between non-interpolable values. Author : abhishek.ka Commit description: In current transition animations, for any lengthsize css property irrespective of interpolable values animation does start. This patch will check whether the values are interpolable and decides as follows: i) If values are interpoable, start animation, ii) else, hard set the respective length property to the element . BUG= 513127 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1732323003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#382801} Commit : 4d344058522e01d85162fcd1a9e5f4b747db9383 Date : Wed Mar 23 06:48:44 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@382608 146.382476 6.638955 5 good chromium@382720 150.737907 3.363064 5 good chromium@382776 150.52893 3.988487 5 good chromium@382790 154.520176 8.73615 5 good chromium@382797 149.04027 3.232169 5 good chromium@382799 150.686074 4.490894 5 good chromium@382800 144.917371 0.834203 5 good chromium@382801 214.833181 8.459204 5 bad <- chromium@382804 213.588733 2.713776 5 bad chromium@382831 213.879495 2.505079 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_webview_aosp_perf_bisect Bug ID: 597630 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.key_silk_cases Test Metric: frame_time_discrepancy/frame_time_discrepancy Relative Change: 46.11% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_webview_aosp_perf_bisect/builds/105 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9015920952723987744 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=597630 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mustaq@chromium.org
, Mar 24 2016