Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.8% regression in webrtc.getusermedia at 382526:382532 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 30 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@382525 15075.55555682.443722 18 good chromium@382532 15065.77777892.027845 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 597623 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests webrtc.getusermedia Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser Relative Change: 0.18% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1230 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016732628123238352 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=597623 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Mar 31 2016
Kicked off another bisect with a modified range.
,
Mar 31 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Roll src/third_party/catapult/ 8d9e4952d..c52974880 (1 commit). Author : catapult-deps-roller Commit description: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/github.com/catapult-project/catapult.git/+log/8d9e4952d037..c52974880be8 $ git log 8d9e4952d..c52974880 --date=short --no-merges --format='%ad %ae %s' CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS= TBR=catapult-sheriff@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1819823003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#382518} Commit : 0fbcbd2b96fee4d6bd5fc7f4700225bc4af9b442 Date : Tue Mar 22 06:36:49 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@382503 14621.0 188.294602 8 good chromium@382513 14544.0 22.090722 5 good chromium@382516 14528.0 31.874755 5 good chromium@382517 14697.6 183.577776 5 good chromium@382518 15070.4 61.29274 5 bad <- chromium@382523 15012.8 149.837245 5 bad chromium@382542 15044.0 171.900303 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 597623 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests webrtc.getusermedia Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser Relative Change: 2.93% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1231 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9016665507580600256 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=597623 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mustaq@chromium.org
, Mar 24 2016