Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
15.2% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail at 378452:378467 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 23 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@378451 81634.1178242120.833645 18 good chromium@378467 81909.0398341683.433185 18 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 597235 Test Command: python src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail Test Metric: V8_MemoryHeapSampleTotalUsed/https___mail.google.com_mail_ Relative Change: 0.03% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_10_perf_bisect/builds/474 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9017404176756644512 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with label Cr-Tests-AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Mar 23 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : [DevTools] Postpone more agents instantiation until attached. Author : dgozman Commit description: To support multiple attached devtools, we have to instantiate individual agents on demand, rather than on creation. This patch moves most of agents, with only worker and inspector to go. BUG= 590878 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1746393003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#378509} Commit : b547858514737d59af3c55b2b06b4e511624c304 Date : Tue Mar 01 19:17:51 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@378400 112893.7165061434.942535 5 good chromium@378500 112779.6977951954.645633 5 good chromium@378507 113290.799201836.520946 5 good chromium@378508 113826.9492461911.051385 5 good chromium@378509 126046.4898721156.357802 5 bad chromium@378510 126725.969297633.251572 5 bad chromium@378513 126785.1923471178.730005 5 bad chromium@378525 127152.2871421428.238898 5 bad chromium@378550 126592.4902611003.989285 5 bad chromium@378600 126268.2938591516.63646 5 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 597235 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail Test Metric: V8_MemoryHeapSampleTotalCommitted/https___mail.google.com_mail_ Relative Change: 11.85% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6338 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9017395035748493312 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with label Cr-Tests-AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ulan@google.com
, Mar 23 2016