Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
162.5% regression in blink_perf.svg at 382264:382272 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionLooks like a significant regression.
,
Mar 22 2016
This might be a false alarm, the ref moved too. Lets see if the bots find anything.
,
Mar 23 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Value Std. Dev. Num Values Good? chromium@382263 1508.681056 74.544116 18 good chromium@382272 1526.068222 103.107467 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 596952 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.svg Test Metric: Bamboo/Bamboo Relative Change: 0.31% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/543 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9017468787950931360 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with label Cr-Tests-AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Mar 29 2016
just to update, the previous bisect aborted. alexclarke@ could you please check the issue.
,
Mar 29 2016
Looking at the graphs I can see the ref changing in sync. We can close this. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Mar 22 2016